← All bank profiles
Examined: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:00 GMT

State Street Bank and Trust Company

RSSD 35301 · MA · Total assets $360,681M
Composite CAMELS
3
3 — Less than satisfactory
C
Capital
2
0 findings
A
Asset Quality
2
1 finding
M
Management
2
0 findings
E
Earnings
5
1 finding
L
Liquidity
5
1 finding
S
Sensitivity
2
0 findings
2
Critical
0
High
1
Moderate
0
Low
24
Procedures run

Findings

CRITICAL · Earnings Procedure E-02

Net interest margin materially compressed

Citation
FFIEC UBPR User's Guide §IV — Earnings Analysis; OCC Comptroller's Handbook, "Interest Rate Risk"
Evidence
Year-to-date net interest margin is 1.18%. Compressed margin can reduce core earnings capacity and may indicate asset-yield pressure, funding-cost pressure, interest-rate-risk exposure, or adverse balance-sheet mix.
Recommended action
Provide management's margin analysis, including earning-asset yields, funding costs, repricing gaps, deposit betas, and modeled sensitivity to parallel and nonparallel rate shocks. Document board-approved actions to restore sustainable margin without assuming excessive credit, liquidity, or interest-rate risk.
CRITICAL · Liquidity Procedure L-03

Uninsured deposit concentration elevated

Citation
Federal Reserve, Review of the Federal Reserve's Supervision and Regulation of Silicon Valley Bank (April 28, 2023); Joint Agency Statement on Liquidity Risk Management (July 28, 2023); FDIC FIL-84-2008, Liquidity Risk Management
Evidence
Total deposits $266,945M and insured deposits $20,712M indicate material uninsured-deposit exposure. Uninsured deposits are calculated as total deposits less insured deposits and can be more prone to rapid runoff under stress. Threshold calibration: post-SVB community-bank median uninsured share is 40-55%; this rule fires above 55% because that level requires explicit liquidity contingency planning.
Recommended action
Provide deposit segmentation by customer type, size, relationship tenure, and operational dependency. Update liquidity stress assumptions for uninsured runoff, identify high-confidence contingent funding sources (FHLB, discount window, BTFP collateral pre-positioning), and document board-approved concentration limits and trigger-based escalation.
MODERATE · Asset Quality Procedure A-05

Allowance to loans is below de minimis review threshold

Citation
Interagency Policy Statement on Allowances for Credit Losses (June 2020; revised April 2023) - https://www.federalreserve.gov/frrs/guidance/interagency-policy-statement-on-allowances-for-credit-losses.htm
Evidence
Allowance for credit losses $173M is measured against total loans and leases $43,374M. A very low allowance-to-loans ratio requires support that expected credit losses are appropriately estimated under CECL.
Recommended action
Provide the CECL model documentation, historical loss support, qualitative-factor framework, segmentation analysis, back-testing results, and board materials supporting the allowance level relative to the size, composition, and risk profile of the loan portfolio.

Key ratios computed

Tier 1 ratio
15.49%
↑ rank 8 of 16 · global
Tier 1 leverage
6.09%
↑ rank 16 of 16 · global
Total capital
16.07%
↑ rank 8 of 16 · global
NPL ratio
0.44%
ACL coverage
90.58%
CRE concentration
5.46%
Construction conc.
0.00%
ROA (annualized)
0.85%
↑ rank 13 of 16 · global
NIM
1.18%
↑ rank 15 of 16 · global
Efficiency ratio
68.77%
↓ rank 15 of 16 · global
Loans / Deposits
16.25%
Brokered / Deposits
6.33%
Uninsured / Deposits
92.24%
Liquid asset ratio
32.25%
HTM loss / Tier 1
Asset growth YoY

Trend — last 8 quarters

Total assets ($M)
$348,989M
23Q03$287,069M 23Q06$290,889M 23Q09$280,469M 23Q12$293,238M 24Q03$333,667M 24Q06$321,473M 24Q09$334,336M 24Q12$348,989M
Tier 1 leverage
6.09%
23Q036.76% 23Q066.70% 23Q096.78% 23Q126.33% 24Q036.18% 24Q066.13% 24Q096.21% 24Q126.09%
Tier 1 RBC ratio
15.49%
23Q0315.82% 23Q0615.66% 23Q0914.90% 23Q1215.41% 24Q0315.19% 24Q0615.39% 24Q0915.76% 24Q1215.49%
ROA (YTD ann.)
0.85%
23Q030.84% 23Q060.93% 23Q090.85% 23Q120.72% 24Q030.68% 24Q060.80% 24Q090.82% 24Q120.85%
NIM (YTD ann.)
1.18%
23Q031.46% 23Q061.45% 23Q091.42% 23Q121.41% 24Q031.22% 24Q061.22% 24Q091.19% 24Q121.18%
Efficiency ratio
68.8%
23Q0371.1% 23Q0668.7% 23Q0968.3% 23Q1273.2% 24Q0375.0% 24Q0670.8% 24Q0969.3% 24Q1268.8%

This report was produced in <200ms from the underlying procedures library. Production deployments cite source documents directly from your loan tape, GL, and core system.

Set up a pilot →